Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Title: A comparative analysis of metabarcoding and morphology-based identification of benthic communities across different regional seas
Authors: Cahill, Abigail E.; Pearman, John K.; Borja, Angel; Carugati, Laura; Carvalho, Susana; Danovaro, Roberto; Dashfield, Sarah and David, Romain; Feral, Jean-Pierre; Olenin, Sergej; Siaulys, Andrius; Somerfield, Paul J.; Trayanova, Antoaneta; Uyarra, Maria C.; Chenuil, Anne
Citation: ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2018, 8, 8908-8920
Abstract: In a world of declining biodiversity, monitoring is becoming crucial. Molecular methods, such as metabarcoding, have the potential to rapidly expand our knowledge of biodiversity, supporting assessment, management, and conservation. In the marine environment, where hard substrata are more difficult to access than soft bottoms for quantitative ecological studies, Artificial Substrate Units (ASUs) allow for standardized sampling. We deployed ASUs within five regional seas (Baltic Sea, Northeast Atlantic Ocean, Mediterranean Sea, Black Sea, and Red Sea) for 12-26months to measure the diversity and community composition of macroinvertebrates. We identified invertebrates using a traditional approach based on morphological characters, and by metabarcoding of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene. We compared community composition and diversity metrics obtained using the two methods. Diversity was significantly correlated between data types. Metabarcoding of ASUs allowed for robust comparisons of community composition and diversity, but not all groups were successfully sequenced. All locations were significantly different in taxonomic composition as measured with both kinds of data. We recovered previously known regional biogeographical patterns in both datasets (e.g., low species diversity in the Black and Baltic Seas, affinity between the Bay of Biscay and the Mediterranean). We conclude that the two approaches provide complementary information and that metabarcoding shows great promise for marine monitoring. However, until its pitfalls are addressed, the use of metabarcoding in monitoring of rocky benthic assemblages should be used in addition to classical approaches rather than instead of them.
Keywords: Artificial Substrate Unit (ASU); COI; innovative monitoring; marine invertebrates; metabarcoding; BIODIVERSITY ASSESSMENT; DNA; BIOGEOGRAPHY; DIVERSITY; PATTERNS
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: WILEY
Type: Article
Language: English
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4283
ISSN: 2045-7758
Funder: Seventh Framework Programme [308392]
Saudi Aramco-KAUST Center for Marine Environmental Observations (SAKMEO)
Spanish programme for Talent and Employability
Albion College
Appears in Publication types:Artículos científicos

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.