Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.azti.es/handle/24689/682
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Title: Response of single benthic metrics and multi-metric methods to anthropogenic pressure gradients, in five distinct European coastal and transitional ecosystems
Authors: Borja, Angel; Barbone, Enrico; Basset, Alberto; Borgersen, Gunhild; Brkljacic, Marijana; Elliott, Michael; Garmendia, Joxe Mikel; Marques, Joao Carlos; Mazik, Krysia; Muxika, Inigo; Magalhaes Neto, Joao; Norling, Karl; German Rodriguez, J.; Rosati, Ilaria; Rygg, Brage; Teixeira, Heliana; Trayanova, Antoaneta
Citation: MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2011, 62, 499-513
Abstract: In recent times many benthic indices have been proposed to assess the ecological quality of marine waters worldwide. In this study we compared single metrics and multi-metric methods to assess coastal and transitional benthic status along human pressure gradients in five distinct environments across Europe: Varna bay and lake (Bulgaria), Lesina lagoon (Italy), Mondego estuary (Portugal), Basque coast (Spain) and Oslofjord (Norway). Hence, 13 single metrics (abundance, number of taxa, and several diversity and sensitivity indices) and eight of the most common indices used within the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) for benthic assessment were selected: index of size spectra (ISS), Benthic assessment tool (BAT), Norwegian quality index (NQI), Multivariate AMBI (M-AMBI), Benthic quality index (BQI), (Benthic ecosystem quality index (BEQI), Benthic index based on taxonomic sufficiency (BITS), and infaunal quality index (IQI). Within each system, sampling sites were ordered in an increasing pressure gradient according to a preliminary classification based on professional judgement. The different indices are largely consistent in their response to pressure gradient, except in some particular cases (i.e. BITS, in all cases, or ISS when a low number of individuals is present). Inconsistencies between indicator responses were most pronounced in transitional waters (i.e. IQI, BEQI), highlighting the difficulties of the generic application of indicators to all marine, estuarine and lagoonal environments. However, some of the single (i.e. ecological groups approach, diversity, richness) and multi-metric methods (i.e. BAT, M-AMBI, NQI) were able to detect such gradients both in transitional and coastal environments, being these multi-metric methods more consistent in the detection than single indices. This study highlights the importance of survey design and good reference conditions for some indicators. The agreement observed between different methodologies and their ability to detect quality trends across distinct environments constitutes a promising result for the implementation of the WFD's monitoring plans. Moreover, these results have management implications, regarding the dangers of misclassification, uncertainty in the assessment, use of conflicting indices, and testing and validation of indices. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Indices; Multi-metric methods; Benthic fauna; Pressure gradient; Coastal and transitional waters; Water framework directive; MARINE BIOTIC INDEX; MACROBENTHIC COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; ECOLOGICAL STATUS; METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; SPECIES-DIVERSITY; ESTUARINE QUALITY; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; RIVER MANAGEMENT; HABITAT QUALITY
Issue Date: 2011
Publisher: PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
Type: Article
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.12.009
URI: http://dspace.azti.es/handle/24689/682
ISSN: 0025-326X
E-ISSN: 1879-3363
Funder: European Union [226273]
Appears in Publication types:Artículos científicos



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.