Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.azti.es/handle/24689/120
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Title: Technical mitigation measures for sharks and rays in fisheries for tuna and tuna-like species: turning possibility into reality
Authors: Poisson, Francois; Abascal Crespo, Francisco; Ellis, Jim R.; Pascal, Bach; Santos, Miguel. N.; Seret, Bernard; Korta, Maria; Coelho, Rui; Ariz, Javier; Murua, Hilario; Chavance, Pierre
Abstract: Tuna fisheries have been identified as one of the major threats to populations of other marine vertebrates, including sea turtles, sharks, seabirds and marine mammals. The development of technical mitigation measures (MM) in fisheries is part of the code of conduct for responsible fisheries. An in-depth analysis of the available literature regarding bycatch mitigation in tuna fisheries with special reference to elasmobranchs was undertaken. Studies highlighting promising MMs were reviewed for four tuna fisheries (longline, purse seine, driftnets and gillnet, and rod and line - including recreational fisheries). The advantages and disadvantages of different MMs are discussed and assessed based on current scientific knowledge. Current management measures for sharks and rays in tuna Regional Fishery Management Organizations (t-RFMOs) are presented. A review of relevant studies examining at-vessel and postrelease mortality of elasmobranch bycatch is provided. This review aims to help fisheries managers identify pragmatic solutions to reduce mortality on pelagic elasmobranchs (and other higher vertebrates) whilst minimizing impacts on catches of target tuna species. Recent research efforts have identified several effective MMs that, if endorsed by t-RFMOs, could reduce elasmobranchs mortality rate in international tropical purse seine tuna fisheries. In the case of longline fisheries, the number of operational effective MMs is very limited. Fisheries deploying driftnets in pelagic ecosystems are suspected to have a high elasmobranchs bycatch and their discard survival is uncertain, but no effective MMs have been field validated for these fisheries. The precautionary bans of such gear by the EU and by some t-RFMOs seem therefore appropriate. Recreational tuna fisheries should be accompanied by science-based support to reduce potential negative impacts on shark populations. Priorities for research and management are identified and discussed.
Keywords: Mitigation; elasmobranch; bycatch; pelagic; mortality; tuna regional fishery management organizations; PELAGIC LONGLINE FISHERY; J-HOOK PERFORMANCE; CALIFORNIA RECREATIONAL FISHERY; EASTERN PACIFIC-OCEAN; PURSE SEINE FISHERY; AT-VESSEL MORTALITY; GREAT-BARRIER-REEF; RARE-EARTH-METAL; CIRCLE HOOKS; POSTRELEASE SURVIVAL
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: EDP SCIENCES S A
Type: Article
Language: English
DOI: 10.1051/alr/2016030
URI: http://dspace.azti.es/handle/24689/120
ISSN: 0990-7440
E-ISSN: 1765-2952
Funder: European Commission (Studies for Carrying out the Common Fisheries Policy)
Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship of the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme \[PIEF-GA-2012-326455]
Investigador-FCT contract from Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) - EU European Social Fund
Programa Operacional Potencial Humano \[IF/00253/2014]
Appears in Publication types:Artículos científicos



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.