Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.azti.es/handle/24689/781
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Title: The future of biotic indices in the ecogenomic era: Integrating (e) DNA metabarcoding in biological assessment of aquatic ecosystems
Authors: Pawlowski, Jan; Kelly-Quinn, Mary; Altermatt, Florian and Apotheloz-Perret-Gentil, Laure; Beja, Pedro; Boggero, Angela; Borja, Angel; Bouchez, Agnes; Cordier, Tristan; Domaizon, Isabelle; Feio, Maria Joao; Filipe, Ana Filipa; Fornaroli, Riccardo; Graf, Wolfram; Herder, Jelger; van der Hoorn, Berry and Jones, J. Iwan; Sagova-Mareckova, Marketa; Moritz, Christian and Barquin, Jose; Piggott, Jeremy J.; Pinna, Maurizio; Rimet, Frederic; Rinkevich, Buki; Sousa-Santos, Carla; Specchia, Valeria; Trobajo, Rosa; Vasselon, Valentin; Vitecek, Simon and Zimmerman, Jonas; Weigand, Alexander; Leese, Florian; Kahlert, Maria
Citation: SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 637, 1295-1310
Abstract: The bioassessment of aquatic ecosystems is currently based on various biotic indices that use the occurrence and/or abundance of selected taxonomic groups to define ecological status. These conventional indices have some limitations, often related to difficulties in morphological identification of bioindicator taxa. Recent development of DNA barcoding and metabarcoding could potentially alleviate some of these limitations, by using DNA sequences instead of morphology to identify organisms and to characterize a given ecosystem. In this paper, we review the structure of conventional biotic indices, and we present the results of pilot metabarcoding studies using environmental DNA to infer biotic indices. We discuss the main advantages and pitfalls of metabarcoding approaches to assess parameters such as richness, abundance, taxonomic composition and species ecological values, to be used for calculation of biotic indices. We present some future developments to fully exploit the potential of metabarcoding data and improve the accuracy and precision of their analysis. We also propose some recommendations for the future integration of DNA metabarcoding to routine biomonitoring programs. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Keywords: Biomonitoring; Bioassessment; Marine; Freshwater; Environmental DNA; Metabarcording; COMMUNITY-BASED INDEX; ENVIRONMENTAL DNA; ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT; WATER-QUALITY; BIODIVERSITY ASSESSMENT; BACTERIAL COMMUNITIES; BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES; RIVER BIOASSESSMENT; DIVERSITY; FRAMEWORK
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
Type: Review
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.002
URI: http://dspace.azti.es/handle/24689/781
ISSN: 0048-9697
E-ISSN: 1879-1026
Funder: European Union [CA15219]
Swiss National Sciences Foundation [313003A\_159709]
Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management (SwAM)
Swiss National Science Foundation [PP00P3\_150698, 31003A\_173074]
EDP Biodiversity Chair
ERA Chair in Environmental Metagenomics (EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme) [668981]
FRESHING Project - FCT
COMPETE [PTDC/AAG-MAA/2261/2014-POCI-01-0145-FEDER-356 016824]
German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) [01LI1501E, 01Li1501K]
Italian Ministry of University and Research (MIUR)
Interreg-ADRION [CUP C69H18000250007]
Ministry of National Infrastructures, Energy and Water Resources, Israel
French Biodiversity Agency (AFB)
Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [LTC17075]
Appears in Publication types:Artículos científicos



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.