Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://dspace.azti.es/handle/24689/545
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorBorja, Angel
dc.contributor.authorElliott, Mike
dc.contributor.authorHenriksen, Peter
dc.contributor.authorMarba, Nuria
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-17T08:47:47Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-17T08:47:47Z-
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifierISI:000314693600015
dc.identifier.citationHYDROBIOLOGIA, 2013, 704, 213-229
dc.identifier.issn0018-8158
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.azti.es/handle/24689/545-
dc.description.abstractThe derivation, performance, sensitivity and inherent uncertainty of ecological quality indicators have become major topics in developing tools for the management of marine, transitional and coastal waters. In reviewing the advances in these waters, related to an ecological status assessment, we show the future challenges to be addressed within the European Water Framework Directive (WFD). Using new analyses carried out under the research project `Water Bodies in Europe: Integrative Systems to Assess Ecological status and Recovery', we provide a complete set of assessments for the biological quality elements (BQEs) (phytoplankton, macroalgae-seagrasses, macroinvertebrates and fish) to be assessed, as well as the validation of existing indicators and multimetric indices and, in some cases, the development of new assessment indices. We show that these indices respond differently to different human pressures and they each have challenges in defining reference conditions against which future changes are judged. In investigating good ecological potential, as the response to heavily modified water bodies, we show that there are flaws in the Directive, not least in its definitions. Our analyses have also focussed on uncertainty in using the indices and we emphasise the problems of defining ecological class boundaries based on indices which themselves may be combined indices (multimetrics). The analysis shows that some of those multimetrics are redundant and/or are inter-correlated and thus may reduce the sensitivity in defining ecological class boundaries. If this is related to the drivers-pressures-state change-impacts-response approach then there are lessons for management measures aimed at achieving good ecological status and even the potential for legal challenges to decisions based on uncertain indices under the WFD. Hence, we conclude the continued need for advances in assessing pressures and gradients, and defining reference conditions for state change, index development, impact assessment and the validation of indices for each BQE.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSPRINGER
dc.subjectWater framework directive
dc.subjectMethods of quality assessment
dc.subjectUncertainty
dc.subjectResponse to human pressures
dc.subjectBiological quality elements
dc.subjectMULTIVARIATE INDEX POMI
dc.subjectQUALITY STATUS
dc.subjectANTHROPOGENIC PRESSURES
dc.subjectUNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS
dc.subjectMARINE SYSTEMS
dc.subjectESTUARIES
dc.subjectFISH
dc.subjectMANAGEMENT
dc.subjectCLASSIFICATION
dc.subjectCOMMUNITIES
dc.titleTransitional and coastal waters ecological status assessment: advances and challenges resulting from implementing the European Water Framework Directive
dc.typeReview
dc.identifier.journalHYDROBIOLOGIA
dc.format.page213-229
dc.format.volume704
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Union [226273]
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10750-012-1276-9
Aparece en las tipos de publicación: Artículos científicos



Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.