Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.azti.es/handle/24689/292
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
benthos distribution.pdf581,76 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Benthos distribution modelling and its relevance for marine ecosystem management
Authors: Reiss, Henning; Birchenough, Silvana; Borja, Angel; Craeymeersch, Johan; Dannheim, Jennifer; Galparsoro, Ibon; Gogina, Mayya; Neumann, Hermann; Populus, Jacques; Rengstorf, Anna M.; Valle, Mireia; Zettler, Michael L.; Degraer, Steven; Buhl-Mortensen, Lene; Darr, Alexander; van Hoey, Gert
Citation: ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2015, 72, 297-315
Abstract: Marine benthic ecosystems are difficult to monitor and assess, which is in contrast to modern ecosystem-based management requiring detailed information at all important ecological and anthropogenic impact levels. Ecosystem management needs to ensure a sustainable exploitation of marine resources as well as the protection of sensitive habitats, taking account of potential multiple-use conflicts and impacts over large spatial scales. The urgent need for large-scale spatial data on benthic species and communities resulted in an increasing application of distribution modelling (DM). The use of DM techniques enables to employ full spatial coverage data of environmental variables to predict benthic spatial distribution patterns. Especially, statistical DMs have opened new possibilities for ecosystem management applications, since they are straightforward and the outputs are easy to interpret and communicate. Mechanistic modelling techniques, targeting the fundamental niche of species, and Bayesian belief networks are the most promising to further improve DM performance in the marine realm. There are many actual and potential management applications of DMs in the marine benthic environment, these are (i) early warning systems for species invasion and pest control, (ii) to assess distribution probabilities of species to be protected, (iii) uses in monitoring design and spatial management frameworks (e.g. MPA designations), and (iv) establishing long-term ecosystem management measures (accounting for future climate-driven changes in the ecosystem). It is important to acknowledge also the limitations associated with DM applications in a marine management context as well as considering new areas for future DM developments. The knowledge of explanatory variables, for example, setting the basis for DM, will continue to be further developed: this includes both the abiotic (natural and anthropogenic) and the more pressing biotic (e.g. species interactions) aspects of the ecosystem. While the response variables on the other hand are often focused on species presence and some work undertaken on species abundances, it is equally important to consider, e.g. biological traits or benthic ecosystem functions in DM applications. Tools such as DMs are suitable to forecast the possible effects of climate change on benthic species distribution patterns and hence could help to steer present-day ecosystem management.
Keywords: ecosystem approach; environmental monitoring; habitat suitability modelling; macrofauna; mapping; marine spatial planning (MSP); predictive modelling; species distribution modelling; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELS; PREDICTING SUITABLE HABITAT; NICHE FACTOR-ANALYSIS; SEA-FLOOR INTEGRITY; PSEUDO-ABSENCE DATA; WESTERN BALTIC SEA; CLIMATE-CHANGE; NORTH-SEA; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; SPATIAL PREDICTION
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: OXFORD UNIV PRESS
Type: Review
Language: English
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsu107
URI: http://dspace.azti.es/handle/24689/292
ISSN: 1054-3139
E-ISSN: 1095-9289
Appears in Publication types:Artículos científicos



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.